To governors and executive directors of the IMF,
The ‘gentleman’s agreement’, which has ensured that the IMF
managing director has, for 75 years, been European and the World Bank president
a US national, is undemocratic, illegitimate, and rooted in neo-colonial
International institutions currently face a crisis of legitimacy,
as faith in the multilateral system of global governance withers. If the IMF
and World Bank want to present themselves as modern institutions capable of
tackling today’s challenges, it is imperative that they become democratic and
accountable to all of those they represent.
Despite over 150 civil society
organisations and individuals calling on
the World Bank for an open, transparent and merit-based leadership succession
process earlier this year, the US candidate David Malpass was appointed
president of the World Bank. This, exacerbated by the fact that the only other
nominee cited pressure from “other governments” as the reason for
withdrawing, brought global governance into further disrepute.
It is high time to end the ‘gentleman’s agreement’ and replace it
with a genuinely open, democratic, merit-based, transparent process, that goes
beyond rhetorical commitment, and allows candidates, regardless of nationality,
to be put forward on an equal footing. In line with longstanding
civil society demands, we believe that no country – or indeed bloc of countries
– should wield excessive power in this process. Instead, the winning candidate
should gain support of a majority of both voting shares and member
Continue reading “Open letter demanding a fair selection process for the next IMF managing director”
The ‘gentleman’s agreement’, which has ensured that the IMF managing director has, for 75 years, been European and the World Bank president a US national, is undemocratic and illegitimate.
Bretton Woods Project, alongside our global partners, has drafted a campaign letter to be sent to IMF executive directors, governors and deputy governors, calling on them to bring about a genuinely open, democratic, merit-based, transparent process, that goes beyond rhetorical commitment, and allows any government, regardless of nationality, to put forward candidates on an equal footing.
If you are a civil society organisation or an academic interested in supporting the campaign, send an email to email@example.com, who will send you a copy of the letter to sign. The deadline for signatures is close of play on Thursday 15th August.
75 years is enough – It is time to end the ‘gentleman’s agreement’.
The maximum age for a candidate to be appointed Managing
Director is currently under 65 years old, and currently stipulates that this
person cannot hold the position of managing director beyond their 70th
birthday. However, rumours have been circulating as to whether the Fund will
scrap this to shoehorn in a favoured European candidate.
Kristalina Georgieva, who is currently the World Bank chief
executive and a Bulgarian national, is rumoured to be backed by the French in
the leadership race. France plays a particularly powerful role in the selection
process as Bruno Le Maire, the French finance minister, is coordinating the European
selection process. Georgieva is however 65 years old, meaning that should she
be appointed, the IMF would need to change its age limit rule.
It was reported
in the Financial Times on July 26 that France had floated the option of
changing the age limit, but that did not attract support from the board on
Friday . The Financial Times article added that “Nonetheless, people familiar
with the matter said the age limit could still be tweaked at a later stage if
Ms Georgieva emerged as the board’s choice.”
Just on the same day as the publication of the article – and on the same day that France floated the age limit change – the IMF published an update entitled “Frequently Asked Questions on Managing Director (MD) Selection”. The update had a section at the very bottom of the page entitled “How can the age limit be changed? When can it be changed?”, which noted that: “The Fund’s By-Laws would need to be amended by the Board of Governors by a majority of the votes cast. The age limit could be changed either before or after the nomination period closes. A nominee who is above the age limit could not be appointed Managing Director until the By-Laws were amended to remove or modify the age limit.”
Continue reading “Will the IMF change its managing director age limit to suit the Europeans?”